November 9, 2026
By the end of this session, you should be able to:
You will rarely read the EEG yourself. You will:
The most common EEG error is not missing an abnormality, it’s calling a normal finding abnormal. Over-read EEGs lead to epilepsy misdiagnosis and unnecessary ASMs.
Consequence: a normal scalp EEG does not mean normal brain. Deep, small, or tangentially oriented sources can be invisible.
Dipole model; from F. Borlot teaching deck (2019)
Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography, ch. 2
Rhythms are about networks. Slowing means dysfunction; it doesn’t tell you the cause.
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
Each line on the screen = the voltage of Input 1 relative to Input 2, plotted over time.
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
| Setting | Typical value | What it does | Pitfall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 7 µV/mm (adults); often 10–15 µV/mm in children | Vertical scale | Lower number = bigger waves. Asymmetries can appear or disappear |
| Time base | 30 mm/s (10 s per page) | Horizontal scale | Compressing time makes waves look sharper and faster |
| Low-frequency filter (LFF) | 1 Hz (0.5 Hz in neonates) | Removes slow drift | Set too high, it erases real delta |
| High-frequency filter (HFF) | 70 Hz | Removes muscle/fast noise | Set too low, muscle can look like spikes or beta |
| Notch | 60 Hz (N. America) | Removes mains noise | Masks a bad electrode that should be fixed |
When something looks odd, check the settings first.
| Band | Frequency | Where you’ll see it normally |
|---|---|---|
| Delta (δ) | < 4 Hz | Infants; deep sleep at any age |
| Theta (θ) | 4 – < 8 Hz | Young children awake; drowsiness at any age |
| Alpha (α) | 8 – 13 Hz | Posterior dominant rhythm (age ≥ ~3 y), eyes closed |
| Beta (β) | > 13 Hz | Frontocentral; ↑ with benzodiazepines, barbiturates |
Frequencies are given in Hz (cycles per second). To estimate: count waves in one second.
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
1 Hz + 2.4 Hz + 11.7 Hz + 34 Hz = the “messy” wave on the previous slide.
When you describe anything on an EEG, cover:
| Bipolar | Referential | |
|---|---|---|
| Each channel | Electrode vs adjacent electrode | Electrode vs a common reference (ear, Cz, average…) |
| Shows | Voltage gradient between neighbors | Something close to absolute amplitude at each electrode |
| Localize by | Phase reversal | Highest amplitude |
| Strengths | Sharp localization of focal events; little reference contamination | Shows true field shape and amplitude asymmetries |
| Weaknesses | Cancellation of widespread fields; end-of-chain problems | Reference contamination (an “active” reference distorts every channel) |
Average reference = each electrode vs the average of all (or most) electrodes; good for focal fields, contaminated by large ones.
Always look at a finding in more than one montage.
The default reading montage in most labs:
Front to back, left over right.
Referential: look for the biggest deflection. Bipolar: look for where the pens point at each other.
From F. Borlot teaching deck (2019)
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography, Fig 4-18
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography
Instrumental phase reversal: reversal at the shared electrode (F3)
Cancellation (recap of the previous slide): the intervening channel (F3–C3) is flat because both electrodes are equally negative
End of chain: the maximum is at the front of the chain (Fp1 ≈ F3, so Fp1–F3 is flat). Every other channel deflects the same way, so there is no reversal
End-of-chain events (Fp, O, temporal) are why you check a referential montage.
Textbook figures, ch. 8 “Polarity and Field Determinations”; from F. Borlot teaching deck (2019)
Phase reversal in F8–T4 / T4–T6 → maximum at T4 (T8): right mid-temporal spike.
Bipolar montage
Referential montage
Always: does the field make physiologic sense?
Before calling anything abnormal, ask:
Almost every pediatric over-read is a normal finding interpreted against the wrong age or the wrong state.
| Age | PDR (eyes closed) |
|---|---|
| 3–4 months | Emerges, ~3–4 Hz |
| 12 months | ~5–6 Hz |
| 3 years | ~8 Hz |
| 8–10 years | ~9–10 Hz |
| Adolescence | ~10 Hz (adult range 8.5–11) |
Posterior slow waves of youth (PSWY)
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography, Fig 11-18
Atlas of Pediatric EEG, Fig 1-7
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography, Fig 11-21
Vertex waves, sleep spindles, K-complexes, POSTS (positive occipital sharp transients of sleep)
| Feature | Appears | Pediatric note |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep spindles (12–14 Hz, central) | ~6–8 weeks | Asynchronous between hemispheres until ~2 years; this is normal |
| Vertex waves | ~5 months | Can be very tall and sharp in children; easily over-read as spikes |
| K-complexes | ~6 months | Vertex wave + spindle; often with arousal |
| POSTS | Childhood onward | Surface-positive, occipital, “check-mark” shape; normal |
| Hypnagogic hypersynchrony | ~6 mo – ~11 y | See previous slide |
Absence of expected sleep features (e.g., no spindles after 3–4 months) is more concerning than extra sharpness.
Atlas of Pediatric EEG, Fig 8-17
Hyperventilation (HV) (3 min minimum)
Photic stimulation
Sleep / sleep deprivation
The neonatal EEG is a different language, and gets its own session.
For now: don’t apply older-child rules to a neonatal tracing.
Benign variants are real cerebral activity with no clinical significance. Clues:
If you’re not sure whether something is a spike, it probably isn’t. True IEDs usually stand out from the background.
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography, Fig 11-6
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography, Fig 11-12
Libenson, Practical Approach to Electroencephalography, Fig 11-8
| Variant | Age | State | Location | Key feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSWY | 8–14 y | Awake, eyes closed | Occipital | Blocks with eye opening with the PDR |
| Hypnagogic hypersynchrony | 6 mo–11 y | Drowsy / arousal | Diffuse, frontocentral | Paroxysmal but monomorphic |
| Vertex waves | > 5 mo | Sleep | Vertex | Tall and sharp in kids |
| Mu | Older child, adult | Awake | Central | Blocks with contralateral movement |
| 14 & 6 positive bursts | Adolescents | Drowsy / light sleep | Posterior temporal | Positive, ear-reference |
| 6 Hz spike-wave | Adolescents, adults | Drowsy | Generalized | Tiny spike, FOLD vs WHAM |
| BETS | Adults > children | Light sleep | Temporal | Small, brief, no slow wave |
| RMTD | Adolescents, adults | Drowsy | Mid-temporal | Rhythmic theta, no evolution |
| Breach | Any | Any | Over skull defect | Know the history |
Physiologic
Non-physiologic
The best artifact detector is the video and the tech’s notes.
Use EOG channels to separate eye movement from frontal slowing. In neonates, eye movements are also a sleep-state marker (active sleep).
Infusion pump motor: very high frequency, fixed morphology and repetition rate
IV drip: transient with each drop, in an otherwise inactive record
ECMO: rhythmic, regular, device-locked
Clues: too regular, no physiologic field, unchanged by state, and it stops when the device does.
| Section | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Background | PDR frequency for age, reactivity, symmetry, continuity |
| Sleep | Were normal sleep features present? |
| Activation | HV/photic; any response or clinical event |
| Abnormalities | Slowing (focal vs generalized), epileptiform discharges, events |
| Impression | Normal vs abnormal, and why |
| Clinical correlation | How the reader ties it to the question you asked |
Give the reader a good question. “R/o seizure” gets a worse answer than “8 yo with nocturnal facial twitching. ?SeLECTS”.
Epilepsy is a clinical diagnosis. The EEG supports it, classifies it, and guides treatment. It doesn’t make the diagnosis on its own.
Judge everything against what’s normal for this child, in this state.
One channel never localizes. Find the field.
Bipolar for gradients, referential for amplitude and field shape.
Know the variants. If in doubt, it’s probably not a spike.
Most “weird” findings are artifacts or display choices.